In order to pursue this contention you would expound on how "democracy," in this conjunction to political regulation as such, refers in philosophy to the taking in of a specific kind of politics whose regulation is universal.
See How to Cite these pages in books, term papers, etc. More detailed knowledge of the effects of political institutions can be used to discriminate in favor of particular kinds of democratic institutions or modifications of them. The question then is how we can access these objects.
Under any of these three possibilities the structure according to which "democracy" is not a concept of philosophy is put into question.
For instance in the United States, James Madison argued in favor of a fairly strong federal government on the grounds that local governments are more likely to be oppressive to minorities Madison, Hamilton and Jayn.
Aristotleanism flourished as the Islamic Golden Age saw rise to a continuation of the peripaetic philosophers who implemented the ideas of Aristotle in the context of the Islamic world.
In philosophy, the classical theory has been subjected to a number of criticisms but perhaps the most fundamental is that attempts to specify definitions for concepts have a poor track record. Indeed, even in scientific communities the fact that a majority of scientists favor a particular view does not make the minority scientists think that they are wrong, though it does perhaps give them pause Goodinchap.
A democracy is where the government is run by all the people who live under it. But his skepticism is not based in a conception that most people are not intellectually fit for politics. For it can contain nothing but sophistry and illusion.
Nevertheless, as the Biblical tradition reveals, and the historical experience of mankind testifies to with overwhelming evidence, man remains capable of both good and evil. Thus David Hume ends his Enquiry with the famous remark: It follows from there that "democracy" is not necessarily a concept within philosophy.
John Stuart Mill argued that a democratic method of making legislation is better than non-democratic methods in three ways: The city can foster such knowledge by putting aspiring philosophers through a demanding education, and the philosophers will use their knowledge of goodness and virtue to help other citizens achieve these so far as possible.
Musa From Ahmadu Bello University Thank you iprojectmaster for saving my life, please keep it up and may God continue to bless you people. Philosophy would set up a space where politics are discussed in accordance with their sort.
It rather concerns the idea of a process that would bring about the withering of the entire state configuration.
First, Plato Republic, Book VI argued that some people are more intelligent and more moral than others and that those persons ought to rule. One way to understand this argument is as follows.
A number of worries attend this kind of view. Perforce one comes up against the State as a non-thinking entity. One is that its treatment of categorization works best for quick and unreflective judgments.
The term, philosopher king would create an image of a monarchical rule, where his word is law. This is the strongest notion of authority and it seems to be the core idea behind the legitimacy of the state.
As long as the framework within which they make and vote for opposing views is set by public equality, they can know that at base, the society treats them as equals in a way that they can recognize. Yes, "democracy" is relevant "if democracy is to be understood in a sense other than a form of the State.
On the one hand, they seem to involve highly suspect interpretations of behaviors that may or may not imply the kinds of consent that these theorists have in mind.
The trouble is that this makes it difficult to see how to distinguish logically equivalent thoughts. Magna Cartaviewed by many as a cornerstone of Anglo-American political liberty, explicitly proposes the right to revolt against the ruler for justice sake.
Also democracy as a philosophical category is what "brings forward equality. If we start with the principle of equal advancement of interests, we will want to know what it implies. The five issues are: (1) the ontology of concepts, (2) the structure of concepts, (3) empiricism and nativism about concepts, (4) concepts and natural language, and (5) concepts and conceptual analysis.
THE JUSTICE OF SOCRATES’ PHILOSOPHER KINGS responsibility.
If this is correct, one may find in Plato's Republic an account of man's ties to political. Plato’s Notion Of Philosopher King, And Nigerian Leaders, A Comparative Analysis.
CHAPTER ONE. PLATO’S BIOGRAPHY. Plato, one of the greatest philosophers of the world, was born in Athens in the year Bc, of a distinguished Athenian family. On the one hand he distinguishes, according to the logic of class analysis, between two types of democracy: proletarian democracy and bourgeois democracy.
He then asserts the supremacy, in extension and intensity, of the former over the latter. Plato’s thought: A philosophy of reason. Plato was a Greek philosopher known and recognized for having allowed such a considerable philosophical work.
The sensible world, according to Plato is the world of contingent, contrary to the intelligible world, which contains essences or ideas, intelligible forms, models of all things, saving the phenomena and give them meaning. A Philosophical and Historical Analysis of Modern Democracy, Equality, and Freedom Under the Influence of Christianity.
A paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Catholic Social Scientists at Franciscan University of Steubenville, Steubenville, Ohio,An analysis of the philosophy of democracy and the concept of philosopher king